From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. DiRoma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 10, 1998
251 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 10, 1998

Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.

Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Balio and Fallon, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to raise in his omnibus motion his present contention that the assault counts of the indictment should have been dismissed because they failed to apprise him sufficiently of the operative facts constituting the crimes of assault. Thus, defendant has failed to preserve that contention for our review ( see, People v. Waldron, 162 A.D.2d 485; People v. Di Noia, 105 A.D.2d 799, 800, lv denied 64 N.Y.2d 759, cert denied 471 U.S. 1022; see also, CPL 210.20, 210.25 Crim. Proc.). In any event, defendant was given fair notice of the charges against him ( see, People v. Nichols, 193 A.D.2d 764, 765, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 723).

The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.


Summaries of

People v. DiRoma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 10, 1998
251 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. DiRoma

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SCOTT L. DiROMA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 10, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 829

Citing Cases

People v. Stabb

Furthermore, McCarthy was not required, as defendant urges, to immediately arrest him based solely on the…