From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dingley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1977
366 N.E.2d 877 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued May 4, 1977

Decided June 14, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, JOHN J. CLYNE, J.

Paul T. Devane and Joseph M. Ingarra for appellant. Sol Greenberg, District Attorney (George H. Barber of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Of the several issues raised by defendant, one requires a reversal of the conviction and a new trial.

Although the determination at trial, which precluded the introduction of evidence of the victim's prior specific acts of violence of which the defendant had knowledge, was correct when made, People v Miller ( 39 N.Y.2d 543) has since changed the rule and requires a reversal here.

As was recognized by the Appellate Division, however, no error was made in the court's charge on justification. The common-law exception, which made the duty to retreat inapplicable when assault was charged, did not survive the statutory amendment embodied in section 35.15 of the Penal Law.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order reversed and a new trial ordered in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Dingley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1977
366 N.E.2d 877 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Dingley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARTIN J. DINGLEY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 14, 1977

Citations

366 N.E.2d 877 (N.Y. 1977)
366 N.E.2d 877
397 N.Y.S.2d 789

Citing Cases

People v. Davis

However, even according to defendant's testimony, he stabbed Reed before Brown got close to him and Brown was…

Washington v. Harris

Rather, after a careful reading of the statute with the goals of the revision in mind, the Court concludes…