From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dingle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1988
137 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

February 1, 1988

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We agree with the hearing court's conclusions that there was neither suggestiveness nor illegality in any of the identification procedures conducted by police detectives. Suppression of such testimony was, therefore, properly denied (see, People v Pleasant, 54 N.Y.2d 972, cert denied 455 U.S. 924).

The defendant's other contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either without merit or unpreserved for appellate review. Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dingle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1988
137 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Dingle

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT DINGLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1988

Citations

137 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)