From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dingle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 20, 1998
254 A.D.2d 131 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 20, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.).


Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. Defendant lacked standing to suppress a pouch from which vials of crack cocaine were recovered, because defendant did not establish that he retained any legitimate expectation of privacy in the pouch after he threw it, upon the legitimate approach of the police, into a van parked nearby ( People v. Ramirez-Portoreal, 88 N.Y.2d 99). Although defendant bears the burden of proof with respect to standing, he never asserted any connection with the van and, once he threw the pouch into it, he could not reasonably expect that others would not have access to the pouch ( People v. DeLaCruz, 242 A.D.2d 410; People v. Laws, 208 A.D.2d 317).

Concur — Lerner, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Dingle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 20, 1998
254 A.D.2d 131 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Dingle

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHNNY DINGLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 131 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 19

Citing Cases

People v. Febo

As the police lawfully approached defendant, he opened the front passenger door of a driver-occupied parked…