From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dietz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 11, 2012
97 A.D.3d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-07-11

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Kordian DIETZ, appellant.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (John M. Dowden of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Marcia R. Kucera of counsel), for respondent.


Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (John M. Dowden of counsel), for appellant.Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Marcia R. Kucera of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Asher, J.), rendered June 30, 2010, convicting him of assault in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15(5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902). The evidence established that, when the defendant hit the complainant in the face with a bottle, he intended to cause serious physical injury and to disfigure the complainant seriously and permanently, or to destroy, amputate or disable permanently a member or organ of his body ( seePenal Law §§ 120.10[1], [2] ). Moreover, the People disproved the defendant's justification defense, since the evidencedemonstrated that the defendant could not have reasonably believed that the complainant was using or was about to use deadly physical force on him ( seePenal Law § 35.15 [2] [a] ).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

DILLON, J.P., BELEN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dietz

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 11, 2012
97 A.D.3d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Dietz

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Kordian DIETZ, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

Citations

97 A.D.3d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
947 N.Y.S.2d 891
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5544

Citing Cases

People v. Komynar

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that he intended to cause…

People v. Komynar

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that he intended to cause…