From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Diemer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 18, 1916
111 N.E. 1094 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Submitted October 20, 1915

Decided January 18, 1916

Thomas C. Whitlock for appellant.

James C. Cropsey, District Attorney ( Ralph E. Hemstreet and Hersey Egginton of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment modified by striking therefrom the amount allowed for interest upon the recognizances from the date of forfeiture, and as modified affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of HISCOCK, J., in People v. Parisi ( 217 N.Y. 24).

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, HOGAN, CARDOZO, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Diemer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 18, 1916
111 N.E. 1094 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

People v. Diemer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . JOHN DIEMER, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 18, 1916

Citations

111 N.E. 1094 (N.Y. 1916)
111 N.E. 1094