From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Diel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1961
13 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

May 31, 1961


Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Richmond County, dated May 11, 1959, denying, after a hearing, his coram nobis application to vacate a judgment of said court rendered December 8, 1939, convicting him, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to serve a term of 20 years to life. Order affirmed. Although defendant was not present at the time the jury returned to the courtroom for further instructions, nevertheless, for such violation of section 427 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, coram nobis does not lie because: (1) the trial minutes do not show defendant's presence and, therefore, there is no issue of fact raised outside the record as to defendant's absence at the time; and (2) defendant had the remedies of appeal and motion for new trial available to him to correct the error arising from the violation of said section ( People v. Shapiro, 3 N.Y.2d 203). Defendant failed to sustain the burden of showing that there was evidence available to the People that he was insane at the time of the commission of the crime, or that such evidence was suppressed by the prosecutor (cf. People v. Blank, 4 A.D.2d 755, cert. denied 355 U.S. 963). Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Diel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1961
13 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

People v. Diel

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM B. DIEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 31, 1961

Citations

13 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

People v. Woodcock

It is not clear whether that fact was known to the court and prosecutor at the time of the acceptance in 1958…

People v. Cunningham

Thus, if a defendant failed to pursue direct appellate procedures for review of appealable claims, he could…