From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dickinson

Court of Appeals of New York
Dec 15, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 9001 (N.Y. 2011)

Opinion

No. 235

12-15-2011

The People & c., Respondent, v. Robert Guy Dickinson, Appellant.

Robert M. Winn, for appellant. Katherine G. Henley, for respondent. New York State Defenders Association, amicus curiae.


Robert M. Winn, for appellant.

Katherine G. Henley, for respondent.

New York State Defenders Association, amicus curiae.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

It is undisputed that the People were not ready for trial within six months of the commencement of the action, as CPL 30.30 (1) (a) requires, even after application of the exclusions listed in CPL 30.30 (4). The People's only claim is that defendant waived his rights under CPL 30.30 by participating in plea negotiations for several months.

While a defendant may waive rights under CPL 30.30 (People v Waldron, 6 NY3d 463 [2006]), the record here contains no evidence of any waiver, written or oral. Mere silence is not a waiver. We repeat our observation in Waldron that "prosecutors would be well advised to obtain unambiguous written waivers in situations like these" (id. at 468).

Order reversed and indictment dismissed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dickinson

Court of Appeals of New York
Dec 15, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 9001 (N.Y. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:The People & c., Respondent, v. Robert Guy Dickinson, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Dec 15, 2011

Citations

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 9001 (N.Y. 2011)