From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dickinson

Court of Appeals of New York.
Dec 15, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 9001 (N.Y. 2011)

Opinion

2011-12-15

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Robert Guy DICKINSON, Appellant.

Robert M. Winn, Granville, for appellant. Kevin C. Kortright, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Katherine G. Henley of counsel), for respondent.


Robert M. Winn, Granville, for appellant. Kevin C. Kortright, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Katherine G. Henley of counsel), for respondent. New York State Defenders Association, Albany (Alfred O'Connor of counsel), for New York State Defenders Association, amicus curiae.MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

It is undisputed that the People were not ready for trial within six months of the commencement of the action, as CPL 30.30(1)(a) requires, even after application of the exclusions listed in CPL 30.30(4). The People's only claim is that defendant waived his rights under CPL 30.30 by participating in plea negotiations for several months.

While a defendant may waive rights under CPL 30.30 ( People v. Waldron, 6 N.Y.3d 463, 814 N.Y.S.2d 70, 847 N.E.2d 367 [2006] ), the record here contains no evidence of any waiver, written or oral. Mere silence is not a waiver. We repeat our observation in Waldron that “prosecutors would be well advised to obtain unambiguous written waivers in situations like these” ( id. at 468, 814 N.Y.S.2d 70, 847 N.E.2d 367).

Order reversed and indictment dismissed, in a memorandum.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dickinson

Court of Appeals of New York.
Dec 15, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 9001 (N.Y. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Robert Guy DICKINSON, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Dec 15, 2011

Citations

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 9001 (N.Y. 2011)
962 N.E.2d 257
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 9001
938 N.Y.S.2d 836

Citing Cases

People v. Leubner

The six-month period is calculated by “computing the time elapsed between the filing of the first accusatory…

People v. R.G.

"under CPL 30.30 (4) (b) a defendant may consent to the exclusion of time that would otherwise be chargeable…