Opinion
October 31, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
At the plea proceeding the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see, People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 11). While, under the circumstances of this case, the waiver of appellate review does not extend to the imposition of the enhanced sentence (see, People v. Wimple, 198 A.D.2d 464, 465; People v. Arbil C., 190 A.D.2d 856, 857), the defendant raises no issue on appeal with respect to the sentence imposed. Mangano, P.J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.