Opinion
January 18, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.).
In contention with the appeal of codefendant Richard Deas, this court has previously considered and rejected the argument that the police officers' testimony at the suppression hearing was incredible as a matter of law (see, People v. Deas, 156 A.D.2d 140).
We find defendant's excessive sentence claim to be without merit.
Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.