From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Diaz-Olmo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1047 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-22-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Andres DIAZ–OLMO, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY (Anna Pervukhin of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel; Marina Dimitry on the brief), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY (Anna Pervukhin of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel; Marina Dimitry on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shillingford, J.), rendered July 23, 2014, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 ; People v. Perry, 122 A.D.3d 775, 996 N.Y.S.2d 195 ; People v. Kenner, 77 A.D.3d 853, 909 N.Y.S.2d 545 ; People v. Wade, 41 A.D.3d 288, 839 N.Y.S.2d 724 ). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5 ]; People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d at 348, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 ), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v. Mateo, 2 N.Y.3d 383, 410, 779 N.Y.S.2d 399, 811 N.E.2d 1053 ; People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 ). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902 ).

AUSTIN, J.P., MILLER, LaSALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Diaz-Olmo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1047 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Diaz-Olmo

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Andres DIAZ–OLMO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 22, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 1047 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
148 A.D.3d 1047