Opinion
December 15, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Seewald, J.).
There is no merit to defendant's contention that the evidence against him was incredible as a matter of law because of minor inconsistencies in the testimony of the police officer who testified. Such inconsistencies raised issues of credibility for the jury to determine (People v Davis, 113 A.D.2d 951, 952; People v Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, 757, cert denied 469 U.S. 932), and, upon review of the record, it cannot be said that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.