From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Di Giacomo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 1972
40 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

October 10, 1972


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 7, 1971, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a prison term of not to exceed five years. Judgment reversed as to the sentence, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and case remitted to the Criminal Term for further proceedings in accordance with the views herein set forth. The plea minutes of April 21, 1971 evidence an express promise by the trial court to sentence defendant to a term of not more than five years in the custody of the Narcotic Addiction Control Commission. When defendant appeared for sentencing on December 7, 1971, however, the court mistakenly asserted that it had not made such a promise. If the promised sentence was the inducement for the guilty plea, defendant is entitled to have the promise fulfilled or, if the arrangement is to be undone, the People and defendant are entitled to be restored to the status obtaining before the plea ( People v. Rice, 25 N.Y.2d 822, 823). Rabin, P.J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Di Giacomo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 1972
40 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

People v. Di Giacomo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN DI GIACOMO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 10, 1972

Citations

40 A.D.2d 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

People v. Selikoff

hile many, if not most, sentence arrangements by the court at the time of a guilty plea are expressly made…

People v. Ifill

Rather, we are defining its perimeters to exclude situations where the defendant's claim has not been…