Opinion
2017-10897 2017-10898 2017-10899 2017-10900 Ind. Nos. 1711/14, 1797/14, S.C.I. Nos. 616/17, 617/17
07-10-2019
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Tremaine DEVORE, Appellant.
Martin Goldberg, Franklin Square, NY, for appellant. Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (W. Thomas Hughes of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the brief), for respondent.
Martin Goldberg, Franklin Square, NY, for appellant.
Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (W. Thomas Hughes of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the brief), for respondent.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., MARK C. DILLON, SHERI S. ROMAN, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Appeals by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Nassau County ( Jerald S. Carter, J.), all rendered June 1, 2017, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 1797/14, robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 1711/14, burglary in the third degree under Superior Court Information No. 616/17, and burglary in the second degree under Superior Court Information No. 617/17, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant. ORDERED that the motion of Martin Goldberg for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the appellant's new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,
ORDERED that Warren Landau, 448 West Broadway, Cedarhurst, NY, 11516 is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeals; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant's new assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated May 16, 2018, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeals as a poor person, with the appeals to be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings) and on the briefs of the parties. The parties are directed to file one original and five duplicate hard copies, and one digital copy, of their respective briefs, and to serve one hard copy on each other (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9 [a][4]; [c][1] ).
The brief submitted by the appellant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 is deficient because it fails to analyze potential appellate issues or highlight facts in the record that might arguably support the appeals (see People v. Swenson, 130 A.D.3d 848, 849, 12 N.Y.S.3d 557 ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 252, 256, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676). Since the brief does not demonstrate that assigned counsel fulfilled his obligations under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, we must assign new counsel to represent the appellant (see People v. Swenson, 130 A.D.3d at 850, 12 N.Y.S.3d 557 ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d at 258, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676 ).
Moreover, upon this Court's independent review of the record, we conclude that there are nonfrivolous issues in this case, including, but not necessarily limited to, whether the purported waiver of the defendant's right to appeal was valid (see People v. Pelaez, 100 A.D.3d 803, 803, 954 N.Y.S.2d 554 ) and, if such waiver is found to be invalid, whether the sentences imposed upon the convictions of burglary in the second degree and burglary in the third degree were excessive (see generally People v. Delgado, 80 N.Y.2d 780, 783, 587 N.Y.S.2d 271, 599 N.E.2d 675 ; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 85–86, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).
RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, ROMAN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.