From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Devaney

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 28, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-28

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Terrence DEVANEY, appellant.

Kent V. Moston, Hempstead, N.Y., for appellant. *459Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Robert A. Schwartz and Laurie K. Gibbons of counsel), for respondent.


Kent V. Moston, Hempstead, N.Y., for appellant. *459Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Robert A. Schwartz and Laurie K. Gibbons of counsel), for respondent.

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), imposed April 6, 2011, on the grounds, inter alia, that the sentences are illegal.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentences imposed were not illegal.

Although the defendant's remaining contentions also survive an otherwise valid waiver of his right to appeal ( see People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022), they are without merit.

MASTRO, J.P., FLORIO, BALKIN and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Devaney

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 28, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Devaney

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Terrence DEVANEY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8149
954 N.Y.S.2d 458