From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Desulma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 2006
26 A.D.3d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2003-10886.

February 21, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), imposed November 21, 2003, upon his conviction of arson in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree (two counts).

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Erica Horwitz of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Phyllis Mintz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the resentence is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing.

In reimposing the defendant's original sentence based solely on an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 9, 2002, which decided the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.20, the resentencing court treated the duty of resentencing as a ministerial function, and failed to exercise its own independent discretion based upon its review of all relevant factors ( see People v. Farrar, 52 NY2d 302; People v. Van Pelt, 186 AD2d 604; People v. Martinez, 136 AD2d 745; People v. Martinez, 124 AD2d 505).

The defendant's remaining contentions have been rendered academic in light of the foregoing determination.


Summaries of

People v. Desulma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 2006
26 A.D.3d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Desulma

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISNER DESULMA, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 2006

Citations

26 A.D.3d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1309
809 N.Y.S.2d 208

Citing Cases

People v. Lingle

ant, who had already served more than five years of his sentence at the time of resentencing. ( North…

People v. Vidaurrazaga

Based on the record before us, it is not clear whether the Supreme Court was aware that it had discretion in…