From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Desius

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Dec 20, 2019
178 A.D.3d 1422 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

1149 KA 18–02097

12-20-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Loirmus DESIUS, Also Known as Baboo, Defendant–Appellant.

ANDREW D. CORREIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LYONS, DAVISON LAW OFFICE PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARY P. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. MICHAEL D. CALARCO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LYONS (BRUCE A. ROSEKRANS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


ANDREW D. CORREIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LYONS, DAVISON LAW OFFICE PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARY P. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.

MICHAEL D. CALARCO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LYONS (BRUCE A. ROSEKRANS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Wayne County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, after a nonjury trial, of two counts of assault in the second degree ( Penal Law § 120.05[1] [intentional assault], [4] [reckless assault] ), arising from an altercation during which he punched the victim in the face approximately three times, causing the victim to fall and hit his head on the concrete sidewalk. Defendant continued to punch the victim while the victim was lying on the ground unconscious, and he died as a result of his injuries. Defendant contends, inter alia, that County Court's verdict is inconsistent insofar as the court found him guilty of both recklessly and intentionally causing serious physical injury. Although defendant raised that issue at sentencing, the record " ‘does not reflect that the court ever ruled on ... defendant's motion, and a failure to rule on a motion cannot be deemed a denial thereof’ " ( People v. Stewart, 111 A.D.3d 1395, 1396, 974 N.Y.S.2d 858 [4th Dept. 2013] ; see generally People v. Concepcion, 17 N.Y.3d 192, 197–198, 929 N.Y.S.2d 541, 953 N.E.2d 779 [2011] ). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to County Court to determine defendant's motion.


Summaries of

People v. Desius

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Dec 20, 2019
178 A.D.3d 1422 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Desius

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. LOIRMUS DESIUS, ALSO…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Dec 20, 2019

Citations

178 A.D.3d 1422 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 9164
112 N.Y.S.3d 656

Citing Cases

People v. Desius

Appeal from a judgment of the Wayne County Court (Daniel G. Barrett, J.), rendered July 26, 2018. The appeal…

People v. Wallace

The court stated that it was reserving decision, but there is no indication in the record that the court ever…