Opinion
No. 114481.
December 7, 1999.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the March 30, 1999 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered and, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals as on leave granted to consider whether enforcement of the state requirement concerning flotation devices on watercraft is preempted by a similar tribal regulation and whether enforcement of the flotation device requirement against a defendant who is exercising tribal fishing rights is violative of the guidelines set forth in People v LeBlanc, 399 Mich. 31 (1976). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Markman, J., not participating.
Court of Appeals No. 217137.