From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Delucia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 20, 2003
302 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

245

February 20, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James Yates, J.), rendered June 27, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, 15 years and 3 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

THERESA A. FOUDY, for Respondent.

AMY DONNER ANDREW FINE, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Lerner, Gonzalez, JJ.


The court's modification of its Molineux ruling was proper. During his direct testimony, defendant opened the door to evidence about the reason that the victim owed him money when he testified that the debt had an innocuous origin. Accordingly, it was proper to permit the prosecution to establish that the debt resulted from the sale of marijuana, notwithstanding that the court had previously precluded such evidence (see People v. Fardan, 82 N.Y.2d 638; People v. Baez, 290 A.D.2d 372, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 635; People v. Schwerbel, 224 A.D.2d 830, 831). At the time of the preclusion, and frequently thereafter, the court warned of the danger of opening the door to such evidence.

The trial court properly refused to submit manslaughter in the first degree as a lesser included offense of second-degree murder since there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, that he merely intended to inflict serious physical injury but not to cause death (see People v. Frazier, 291 A.D.2d 211, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 675). Defendant shot the victim in the head from a distance of a few feet after having issued prior threats. Furthermore, defendant told an eyewitness to the shooting that the victim was dead and that the witness was going to be next.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Delucia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 20, 2003
302 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Delucia

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS DeLUCIA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 20, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 637

Citing Cases

People v. Marte

The challenged rulings concerning defense offers of proof were proper exercises of discretion that did not…

People v. Hull

and defendant and the escalating verbal exchange preceding the event, the evidence shows that, during the…