From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. DelCerro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 7, 2002
299 A.D.2d 160 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Summary

In DelCerro, we found that "[d]efense counsel's failure to effectuate defendant's request to testify before the grand jury did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel" (299 AD2d at 161, citing People v. Wiggins, 89 NY2d 872, 873).

Summary of this case from People v. Nobles

Opinion

2117

November 7, 2002.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.), rendered November 12, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 16 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

BETH FISCH, for respondent.

JULIE SENDER, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Sullivan, JJ.


Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was deprived of his opportunity to appear before the grand jury was properly denied as untimely (CPL 190.50 [c]; People v. Biggs, 214 A.D.2d 312), as well as on the merits, since it did not state a sufficient basis for dismissal. Defense counsel's failure to effectuate defendant's request to testify before the grand jury did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel (see People v. Wiggins, 89 N.Y.2d 872).

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The credible evidence satisfied the element of an entry onto premises in that it established that defendant broke the windows to the victim's residence and placed his hands and upper torso inside (see People v. King, 61 N.Y.2d 550; People v. Clarke, 233 A.D.2d 831, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1010;People v. Nestman, 220 A.D.2d 232, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 851).

Defendant's constitutional challenge to the procedure under which he was sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit (see People v. Rosen, 96 N.Y.2d 329, cert denied 534 US 899, 122 S.Ct. 224).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. DelCerro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 7, 2002
299 A.D.2d 160 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

In DelCerro, we found that "[d]efense counsel's failure to effectuate defendant's request to testify before the grand jury did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel" (299 AD2d at 161, citing People v. Wiggins, 89 NY2d 872, 873).

Summary of this case from People v. Nobles
Case details for

People v. DelCerro

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM DelCERRO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 7, 2002

Citations

299 A.D.2d 160 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
753 N.Y.S.2d 358

Citing Cases

People v. Pressley

The failure of an attorney to honor a defendant's desire to testify at the Grand Jury proceeding is not, in…

People v. Nobles

The court noted that the attorney admitted "that he behaved in a manner that almost certainly constitutes…