Opinion
No. 2122 Ind. No. 186/18 Case No. 2019-3999
04-23-2024
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Shyheen Delaney, Defendant-Appellant.
Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant. Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Conor E. Byrnes of counsel), for respondent.
Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Conor E. Byrnes of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kapnick, Kennedy, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Curtis J. Farber, J.), rendered February 27, 2019, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of two years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's challenge to his plea is unpreserved, and we decline to address it in the interest of justice. The narrow exception to the preservation requirement does not apply because nothing in defendant's plea allocution "cast[] significant doubt upon [his] guilt or otherwise call[] into question the voluntariness of the plea" (People v Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666 [1988]). Nothing in defendant's factual recitation negated an essential element of the crime to which he pleaded. Defendant admitted that he caused the victim injury, and his denial of possessing a dangerous instrument was immaterial because he was charged under an acting in concert theory. Further, the court was not required to inquire into any potential defenses raised by the codefendant's postarrest statement to the police that defendant had been knocked unconscious by the victim before the assault, or by defendant's statement to the Department of Probation in connection with preparing a presentence report that he did not know how the victim got stabbed (see People v Grant, 203 A.D.3d 477 [1st Dept 2022], lv denied 38 N.Y.3d 1033 [2022]; People v Vargas, 162 A.D.3d 531 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 32 N.Y.3d 942 [2018]).
As an alternative holding, we reject defendant's arguments on the merits. As noted, nothing defendant said during his plea allocution negated an essential element of the offense to which he pleaded, and the court was under no obligation to inquire about possible defenses raised by the codefendant's and defendant's out-of-court statements. Moreover, defendant's statement in the presentence report that he did not know how the victim got stabbed did not negate his involvement in the altercation or that the codefendant was in possession of a dangerous instrument.