From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Del Campo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 2001
281 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 20, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J.), rendered February 10, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 2½ years, unanimously affirmed.

Hope D. Korenstein, for respondent.

Robin B. Skarstad, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Rubin, JJ.


The trial court properly refused to charge sexual abuse in the third degree as a lesser included offense since no reasonable view of the evidence supported a finding that defendant subjected the complainant to sexual contact, but did so without physical force (see, People v. Negron, 91 N.Y.2d 788). The clear, consistent and integrated testimony of the complainant was that defendant grabbed her chest from behind, lifted her off her feet, and rubbed his genitals against her buttocks while his hands were on her breasts. The act of lifting the complainant off the ground, thereby limiting her freedom of movement was plainly forcible.

Defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim primarily involves questions of trial strategy and matters dehors the record regarding communications between defendant and counsel. To the extent the existing record permits review, it establishes that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 712-713). "Counsel may not be expected to create a defense where it does not exist." (People v. De Freitas, 213 A.D.2d 96, 101, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 872).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Del Campo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 2001
281 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Del Campo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. RAMON DEL CAMPO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 20, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 148

Citing Cases

People v. Mack

We base this conclusion upon the complainant's testimony that defendant stopped making the movements each…

T.Z. v. City of New York

Given that a single instance of sexual assault may rise to the level of `pervasiveness' as a matter of law, I…