From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. DeFreitas

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 13, 2017
156 A.D.3d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

1992–04806 Ind. No. 77897

12-13-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Miguel DEFREITAS, appellant.

Miguel DeFreitas, Wallkill, NY, appellant pro se. Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Daniel S. Bresnahan and Andrea M. DiGregorio of counsel), for respondent. N. Scott Banks, Hempstead, N.Y. (Tammy Feman of counsel), former appellate counsel.


Miguel DeFreitas, Wallkill, NY, appellant pro se.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Daniel S. Bresnahan and Andrea M. DiGregorio of counsel), for respondent.

N. Scott Banks, Hempstead, N.Y. (Tammy Feman of counsel), former appellate counsel.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., REINALDO E. RIVERA, MARK C. DILLON, JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, an opinion and order of this Court dated August 14, 1995 ( People v. DeFreitas, 213 A.D.2d 96, 630 N.Y.S.2d 755 ), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 9, 1992.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, DILLON and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. DeFreitas

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 13, 2017
156 A.D.3d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. DeFreitas

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Miguel DEFREITAS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 13, 2017

Citations

156 A.D.3d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
64 N.Y.S.3d 921

Citing Cases

People v. Callado

Petitioner's contentions with regard to improper joinder and the validity of the indictment concern matters…