From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Defairia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1992
186 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 1, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stephen L. Barrett, J.).


The evidence regarding defendant's tirade in the hallway approximately thirty minutes before he punched one of the victims in the face and forty-five minutes before he stabbed the other victim to death was properly admitted since the incident was relevant to the issues in the case (see, People v Lewis, 69 N.Y.2d 321, 325), including whether defendant acted justifiably when he stabbed the victim. Therefore, contrary to defendant's unpreserved appellate argument, the prosecutor could properly argue in summation that defendant's swearing in the hallway and his assault of the decedent's wife were consistent with the inference that defendant was not acting reasonably and was the initial aggressor when he stabbed the decedent. Furthermore, contrary to defendant's argument, the prosecutor did not impermissibly mischaracterize the defense by arguing in summation that defense counsel wanted the jury to believe that defendant was a victim and that the decedent was not.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Defairia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1992
186 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Defairia

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL DEFAIRIA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
588 N.Y.S.2d 157

Citing Cases

People v. Kellogg

The trial court also appropriately exercised its discretion in permitting the People to establish that during…

People v. Brooks

All of defendant's other claims are unpreserved as a matter of law and in any event do not warrant corrective…