From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Deandrade

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Third Division
Jul 18, 2008
No. G038353 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 18, 2008)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY JOSEPH DEANDRADE, Defendant and Appellant. G038353 California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Third Division July 18, 2008

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Super. Ct. No. 06HF1789

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING

ARONSON, J.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 23, 2008, be modified as follows:

1. On page 5, second sentence of the second paragraph, beginning with “The trial court placed” and ending with “one year in jail” is changed so the sentence reads:

The trial court ordered defendant to serve 365 days in jail.

2. On page 8, the second sentence of the second full paragraph, the words “received an acquittal” are changed to “obtained a better result” so the sentence reads:

Based on our review of the record, we are not convinced defendant would have obtained a better result had the evidence been excluded.

3. On page 9, the last sentence of the first full paragraph, beginning with “We therefore conclude” and ending with “statements been excluded” is deleted and so the sentence reads:

We therefore conclude it is not reasonably probable defendant would have obtained a more favorable result in the absence of the error.

These modifications do not change the judgment. The petition for rehearing is DENIED.

WE CONCUR: SILLS, P. J., IKOLA, J.


Summaries of

People v. Deandrade

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Third Division
Jul 18, 2008
No. G038353 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 18, 2008)
Case details for

People v. Deandrade

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY JOSEPH DEANDRADE…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Third Division

Date published: Jul 18, 2008

Citations

No. G038353 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 18, 2008)