From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Deal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 2009
60 A.D.3d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2005-10931.

March 24, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Crecca, J.), rendered October 14, 2005, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Brian E. O'Donoghue, Huntington, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Marion M. Tang of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Ritter, Covello and Angiolillo, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief.


Summaries of

People v. Deal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 2009
60 A.D.3d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Deal

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DEREK DEAL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2380
874 N.Y.S.2d 824