From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. De Sousa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1980
79 A.D.2d 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

December 29, 1980


Appeal by defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 7, 1980, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment of the same court rendered February 10, 1976. Order affirmed. The absence of defendant and his counsel from the informal interviews conducted by the Trial Judge with two of the jurors does not mandate reversal of the judgment of conviction (see People v. Mullen, 44 N.Y.2d 1; People v Andriani, 67 A.D.2d 20, after remand 73 A.D.2d 864, cert den sub nom. Boutureira v. New York, 444 U.S. 866; cf. Carlisle v. County of Nassau, 64 A.D.2d 15; People ex rel. Wilder v. Markley, 29 A.D.2d 542; People v. O'Keefe, 281 App. Div. 409, affd 306 N.Y. 619). The record shows that defendant waived any objection to the manner in which the juror interviews were conducted or any claim that his lawyer was not provided with the accurate content of those interviews. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Lazer and Cohalan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. De Sousa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1980
79 A.D.2d 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

People v. De Sousa

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS DE SOUSA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1980

Citations

79 A.D.2d 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

People v. Moran

However, in view of the insignificance of what was said during this interview, and in the absence of any…

People v. Bailey

The right of an accused to be present at all material stages of trial is one protected by the Federal and…