From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. De Fiore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 9, 1964
21 A.D.2d 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

July 9, 1964


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered February 7, 1964 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to serve a term of 10 to 15 years. Judgment affirmed. While there was some confusion on sentence, the defendant and his counsel intentionally or unintentionally contributed to such confusion by knowingly making a misrepresentation as to the time to be served by the defendant. Under all the circumstances, there was no prejudice to any substantial right of the defendant.


In our opinion, it is obvious that the defendant was justified in believing that his plea of guilty would result in a sentence of imprisonment for not more than 3 1/2 to 7 years. The court, in discussing and considering such a lesser term, apparently was led to believe that the defendant, on his prior sentences, owed approximately 11 years. It was later discovered that he owed only 2 years, 4 months and 29 days. The mistaken belief apparently resulted from the fact that the defendant's prior sentences of 5 to 10 years were not to run consecutively, but concurrently. In these circumstances, it is our opinion that the interests of justice require that the defendant be remanded for repleading (cf. People v. Farina, 2 A.D.2d 776, affd. 2 N.Y.2d 454, mot. for rearg. den. 2 N.Y.2d 996).


Summaries of

People v. De Fiore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 9, 1964
21 A.D.2d 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

People v. De Fiore

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PAUL DE FIORE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 9, 1964

Citations

21 A.D.2d 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

People v. De Fiore

I see no basis for rejecting these findings. Nor do I find any support, from the evidence adduced, for…