From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dawley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1967
19 N.Y.2d 663 (N.Y. 1967)

Opinion

Argued January 17, 1967

Decided February 16, 1967

Appeal from the Herkimer County Court, LEON J. CIOCH, J.P.

Albert W. Schneider, District Attorney ( Charles E. Crandall, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Philip D. O'Donnell for respondent.


Order of the County Court reversed and case remitted to that court for determination upon the questions of fact raised in that court (Code Crim. Pro., §§ 543-a, 543-b). The mere fact of the presence of a notation of suspension and reinstatement on the face of an operator's license is not ground for the reversal of a conviction for speeding. The provisions of section 501 (subd. 1, par. c) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law are restricted to those matters specifically mentioned therein (cf. People v. Lawton, 17 N.Y.2d 637; see, also, People v. Kingston, 8 N.Y.2d 384; Code Crim. Pro., § 542).

Concur: Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and BREITEL. Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS and KEATING dissent and vote to affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion at the County Court.


Summaries of

People v. Dawley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 16, 1967
19 N.Y.2d 663 (N.Y. 1967)
Case details for

People v. Dawley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. STANTON R. DAWLEY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 16, 1967

Citations

19 N.Y.2d 663 (N.Y. 1967)
278 N.Y.S.2d 855
225 N.E.2d 548

Citing Cases

People v. Michael

Here appellant was not required to and did not in fact exhibit his record of conviction stub to the arresting…

Local 621, S.E.I.U. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Transp.

Applying this principle, the First Department held that "[i]n contrast to Kickertz ... the submitted papers…