Opinion
July, 1926.
Judgment of conviction and orders unanimously affirmed. The court deems that the refusal of the trial court to charge as requested in regard to felonious intent was not prejudicial and did not affect the verdict rendered. (See Penal Law, § 1302.) It likewise considers that the admission of evidence in relation to the entering of judgments against the defendant's firm, after the commission of the crime in question, was not prejudicial error.