From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 22, 1996
224 A.D.2d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 22, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.).


The trial court provided defendant with an adequate opportunity to confer with defense counsel immediately before the parties began to exercise their challenges to a panel of prospective jurors. Under the circumstances, the court properly exercised its discretion by setting a reasonable limit on the amount of time for defendant and counsel to confer ( see, People v. De Jesus, 42 N.Y.2d 519, 523). We have reviewed defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 22, 1996
224 A.D.2d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT DAVIS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 307

Citing Cases

People v. Pierce

During jury selection, the court properly exercised its discretion when, after dismissing one potential juror…