From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 2002
293 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-01898

Argued March 8, 2002.

April 1, 2002.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered February 9, 2000, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (De Nice Powell of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Solomon Neubort, and Dahlia Fredericks of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, SONDRA MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly refused to charge the defense of justification. No reasonable view of the evidence established the basic elements of that defense (see People v. Butts, 72 N.Y.2d 746). Furthermore, the defendant's claim that his counsel was ineffective because he failed to make a specific argument in support of a justification charge is without merit. A justification defense would have been weak and inconsistent with the facts of the case (see People v. Rhodes, 281 A.D.2d 225). Thus, the defendant did not demonstrate that his counsel failed to provide meaningful representation (see People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397; People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 712-713).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, S. MILLER and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 2002
293 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. DAMIEN DAVIS, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 2002

Citations

293 A.D.2d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
739 N.Y.S.2d 635

Citing Cases

People v. Richardson

That defense was buttressed by eyewitness testimony that the person seen "stomping" on the victim at least 19…

People v. Richardson

That defense was buttressed by eyewitness testimony that the person seen "stomping" on the victim at least 19…