From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Davis

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 12, 1989
534 N.E.2d 313 (N.Y. 1989)

Opinion

Decided January 12, 1989

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Alexander Chananau, J.

Stewart E. Sterk for appellant.

Paul T. Gentile, District Attorney (Billie Manning and Peter D. Coddington of counsel), for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for a de novo consideration of the defendant's appeal. That court erred in failing to assign new counsel after determining that the appeal presented a nonfrivolous issue (see, People v Casiano, 67 N.Y.2d 906, 907).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

People v. Davis

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 12, 1989
534 N.E.2d 313 (N.Y. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PATRICK DAVIS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 12, 1989

Citations

534 N.E.2d 313 (N.Y. 1989)
534 N.E.2d 313
537 N.Y.S.2d 475

Citing Cases

People v. Tilghman

The defendant's assigned counsel has submitted a brief in which he concludes that there are no nonfrivolous…

People v. Bunbury

Based on this Court's independent review of the record, we conclude that there are nonfrivolous issues which…