From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 1994
210 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 27, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claims of prosecutorial misconduct do not warrant reversal. However, our affirmance of the defendant's conviction should not be taken as an approval of prosecutorial comments which we find excessive and inappropriate. On the contrary, we affirm, notwithstanding those comments, because proof of the defendant's guilt was overwhelming (see, People v Staley, 130 A.D.2d 601).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 1994
210 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERMAINE DAVIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
620 N.Y.S.2d 986

Citing Cases

People v. Richardson

At the Hinton hearing (see, People v Hinton, 31 N.Y.2d 71), the undercover police officer testified that,…

People v. Anderson

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.). Ordered that the judgment is affirmed (see,…