From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Davey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 20, 1989
156 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

December 20, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By pleading guilty before the court conducted a hearing on his suppression motion, defendant forfeited his right to appellate review of his contention that voice identification evidence should have been suppressed (see, People v Fernandez, 67 N.Y.2d 686; People v Simmons, 121 A.D.2d 483). Because defendant did not request youthful offender treatment at the time of sentencing, he cannot raise that issue on appeal (see, People v McGowen, 42 N.Y.2d 905, rearg denied 42 N.Y.2d 1015; People v Di Marcantonio, 117 A.D.2d 612, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 882). We cannot conclude that imposition of the bargained-for sentence was harsh and excessive in the circumstances of this case.


Summaries of

People v. Davey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 20, 1989
156 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Davey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD DAVEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1989

Citations

156 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
548 N.Y.S.2d 830

Citing Cases

People v. Torres

Defendant argues that County Court erred in failing to determine whether she should be afforded youthful…

People v. Sahagian

The comments are more in the nature of an effort to scold or chastise defendant. In addition, by pleading…