From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dasgupta

Court of Appeals of Michigan
May 21, 2024
No. 369289 (Mich. Ct. App. May. 21, 2024)

Opinion

369289

05-21-2024

PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN v. NEIL ANTONIO DASGUPTA


LC No. 11-009212-01-FC

Anica Letica Presiding Judge Noah P. Hood Adrienne N. Young Judges

ORDER

Anica Letica Presiding Judge

The motion to waive fees is GRANTED for this case only. The motion for peremptory reversal pursuant to MCR 7.211(C)(4) is DENIED.

The delayed application for leave to appeal is DENIED because defendant has failed to establish that the trial court erred in denying the successive motion for relief from judgment. MCR 6.502(G). We note that, while the trial court's order does not specifically address defendant's claim made pursuant to Brady v Maryland, 373 U.S. 83; 83 S.Ct. 1194; 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), the claim is meritless. The evidence purportedly withheld by the prosecutor fails because, even presuming the evidence was withheld, defendant has not demonstrated that there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed, the result of the proceeding would have been different. People v Chenault, 495 Mich. 142, 150; 845 N.W.2d 731 (2014).


Summaries of

People v. Dasgupta

Court of Appeals of Michigan
May 21, 2024
No. 369289 (Mich. Ct. App. May. 21, 2024)
Case details for

People v. Dasgupta

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN v. NEIL ANTONIO DASGUPTA

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: May 21, 2024

Citations

No. 369289 (Mich. Ct. App. May. 21, 2024)