From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Danzy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1992
181 A.D.2d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 30, 1992

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Ain, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood, Rosenblatt and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Danzy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1992
181 A.D.2d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Danzy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHELE DANZY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)