From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Danso

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2022
208 A.D.3d 1363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

2021-08571 Ind. No. 60/21

09-28-2022

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Alhusene DANSO, appellant.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Gianna Gambino on the brief), for respondent.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Gianna Gambino on the brief), for respondent.

VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, PAUL WOOTEN, WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Ushir Pandit–Durant, J.), rendered November 18, 2021, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the imposition of mandatory surcharges and fees; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

However, as consented to by the People, we modify the judgment by vacating the surcharges and fees imposed on the defendant at sentencing (see CPL 420.35[2–a] ; People v. Green, 205 A.D.3d 1051, 1052, 166 N.Y.S.3d 892 ; People v. Douglas, 205 A.D.3d 732, 165 N.Y.S.3d 744 ; People v. Reeves, 203 A.D.3d 1181, 163 N.Y.S.3d 439 ; People v. Sevaughn G., 199 A.D.3d 936, 937, 154 N.Y.S.3d 475 ; People v. Dyshawn B., 196 A.D.3d 638, 152 N.Y.S.3d 131 ).

The defendant's remaining contention is academic in light of our determination.

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., CHAMBERS, WOOTEN and FORD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Danso

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2022
208 A.D.3d 1363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Danso

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Alhusene DANSO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 28, 2022

Citations

208 A.D.3d 1363 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
174 N.Y.S.3d 602

Citing Cases

People v. Wilson

In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit (seePeople v. Manners, 217 A.D.3d 683, 191 N.Y.S.3d…

People v. Wilson

However, as consented to by the People, we modify the judgments by vacating the mandatory surcharges and…