From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Danforth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 11, 1990
166 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 11, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leon Becker, J.).


Defendant's constitutional right to be present during all critical stages of his trial was not violated when the court, in consultation with the prosecutor and defense counsel, formulated a response to a request for a readback of a portion of testimony. (People v. Harris, 76 N.Y.2d 810.) We note that defendant, while absent from the courtroom at the beginning of the consultation, was present at the end, and at the response to the jury's question.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Danforth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 11, 1990
166 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Danforth

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RODNEY DANFORTH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 11, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
560 N.Y.S.2d 630