From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dailey

Supreme Court of Michigan
Mar 12, 2004
469 Mich. 1019 (Mich. 2004)

Opinion

No. 125107.

March 12, 2004.


Summary Disposition.

No. 125107. In lieu of granting leave to appeal, footnote 1 of the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated because it is inconsistent with MCL 769.34(2). MCR 7.302(G)(1). The statute provides that courts shall sentence defendants in accord with the minimum sentences prescribed by the "version of those sentencing guidelines in effect on the date the crime was committed." This demonstrates a legislative intent to have defendant sentenced under the law in effect on the date of his offense, which predated the amendment of MCL 333.7401. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because the Supreme Court is not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. Application for leave to cross-appeal is also denied. Court of Appeals No. 239683.


Summaries of

People v. Dailey

Supreme Court of Michigan
Mar 12, 2004
469 Mich. 1019 (Mich. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Dailey

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. DAILEY

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Mar 12, 2004

Citations

469 Mich. 1019 (Mich. 2004)

Citing Cases

People v. Michielutti

Such a conclusion is also consistent with MCL 769.34(2), which provides generally that a defendant is to be…

Brown v. Davis

And in an unpublished decision, the Michigan Supreme Court vacated a footnote in a Michigan Court of Appeals…