From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Custodio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 27, 2016
141 A.D.3d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

07-27-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Bienvenido CUSTODIO, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY (Mark W. Vorkink of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Meredith D'Angelo of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY (Mark W. Vorkink of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Meredith D'Angelo of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed November 13, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 265, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. DeSimone, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 283, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108 ; People v. Sulsona, 134 A.D.3d 861, 861, 19 N.Y.S.3d 909 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., LEVENTHAL, COHEN, LaSALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Custodio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 27, 2016
141 A.D.3d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Custodio

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Bienvenido CUSTODIO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 27, 2016

Citations

141 A.D.3d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
141 A.D.3d 730
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5655