From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Curtis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 2006
33 A.D.3d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2004-03461.

October 10, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), rendered April 13, 2004, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The plea minutes demonstrate that the defendant's plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently, and that he understood the crime to which he was pleading guilty ( see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Further, the defendant's guilty plea precludes him from challenging claimed defects in the grand jury proceedings ( see People v Hansen, 95 NY2d 227; People v Miller, 306 AD2d 294). Moreover, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Curtis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 2006
33 A.D.3d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Curtis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMMIE CURTIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 10, 2006

Citations

33 A.D.3d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 7369
821 N.Y.S.2d 918

Citing Cases

People v. Curtis

15[1]; People v. Lingle, 16 N.Y.3d at 635, 926 N.Y.S.2d 4, 949 N.E.2d 952). Accordingly, the defendant's…

People v. Ceparano

The plea minutes demonstrate that the defendant's plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently,…