From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Currington

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
Jul 27, 2017
No. 331954 (Mich. Ct. App. Jul. 27, 2017)

Opinion

No. 331954

07-27-2017

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LARRY DUANE CURRINGTON, Defendant-Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED Saginaw Circuit Court
LC No. 14-040592-FC Before: MARKEY, P.J., and RONAYNE KRAUSE and BOONSTRA, JJ. RONAYNE KRAUSE, J. (concurring).

I concur with the majority in all respects but one. Because I agree that the challenged statement from Detective Scott was harmless irrespective of whether it was hearsay, I would simply presume that it was hearsay and decline to decide that issue. The majority includes a paragraph that begins with "Further, even if the challenged testimony were hearsay and thus admitted in error . . . " it did not affect "the outcome of the trial." Thus, I see no reason to make that decision with the limited facts in this case. In all other respects, I concur.

/s/ Amy Ronayne Krause


Summaries of

People v. Currington

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
Jul 27, 2017
No. 331954 (Mich. Ct. App. Jul. 27, 2017)
Case details for

People v. Currington

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LARRY DUANE…

Court:STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Jul 27, 2017

Citations

No. 331954 (Mich. Ct. App. Jul. 27, 2017)