Opinion
No. KA 08-02074.
December 30, 2009.
Appeal from an order of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), entered May 16, 2008. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
GARY A. HORTON, PUBLIC DEFENDER, BATAVIA (BRIDGET L. FIELD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Present: Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Smith and Centra, JJ.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Contrary to defendant's contention, the statements in the case summary constitute reliable hearsay upon which County Court properly relied pursuant to Correction Law § 168-n (3) ( see People v Thompson, 66 AD3d 1455; People v Ramos, 41 AD3d 1250, lv denied 9 NY3d 809; People v Wragg, 41 AD3d 1273, lv denied 9 NY3d 809). Those statements constitute clear and convincing evidence that an upward departure from the presumptive risk level was warranted based upon "an aggravating . . . factor of a kind, or to a degree, . . . otherwise not adequately taken into account by the [risk assessment] guidelines" (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006]).