From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cummings

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 2, 2015
134 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

12-02-2015

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Anthony CUMMINGS, appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Michael C. Taglieri of counsel), for appellant. Daniel L. Master, Jr., Acting District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Anne Grady of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Michael C. Taglieri of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel L. Master, Jr., Acting District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Anne Grady of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Meyer, J.), dated March 21, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The People established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant had previously been convicted of a felony sex crime (see People v. Goods, 121 A.D.3d 660, 992 N.Y.S.2d 810; People v. Smalls, 120 A.D.3d 1145, 992 N.Y.S.2d 880; People v. Carter, 85 A.D.3d 995, 925 N.Y.S.2d 874). Therefore, the defendant was presumptively a level three sex offender pursuant to an automatic override addressing prior felony convictions for sex crimes, irrespective of the points scored on the risk assessment instrument (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 3–4 [2006]; People v. Barfield, 115 A.D.3d 835, 982 N.Y.S.2d 369). Further, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's application for a downward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 861, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1; People v. Wyatt, 89 A.D.3d 112, 128, 931 N.Y.S.2d 85).

RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cummings

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 2, 2015
134 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Cummings

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Anthony CUMMINGS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 2, 2015

Citations

134 A.D.3d 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
19 N.Y.S.3d 772
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 8815

Citing Cases

People v. Broadus

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.The People established, by clear and…

People v. Broadus

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The People established, by clear and…