Opinion
April 29, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fuchs, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant's contention to the contrary notwithstanding, the hearing court did not err in determining that suppression of the items which the police officer seized from his automobile was not warranted ( People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759). Under the facts of this case, People v. Class ( 63 N.Y.2d 491, cert granted ___ US ___, 53 USLW 3702) is not a holding to the contrary.
Defendant's contention that the trial court abused its discretion in restricting defense counsel's examination of prospective jurors is without merit ( see, People v. Pepper, 59 N.Y.2d 353, 358-359; People v. Boulware, 29 N.Y.2d 135).
Finally, defendant's Sandoval contention lacks merit and, in any event, if any error was committed, it was harmless. Titone, J.P., Lazer, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.