Defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his admission is unpreserved for our review because he "did not move on that ground either to withdraw his admission to the violation of probation or to vacate the judgment revoking his sentence of probation" ( People v. Verin , 191 A.D.3d 1245, 1246, 137 N.Y.S.3d 764 [4th Dept. 2021] ; see alsoPeople v. Fox , 159 A.D.3d 1435, 1435, 72 N.Y.S.3d 299 [4th Dept. 2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 1116, 81 N.Y.S.3d 376, 106 N.E.3d 759 [2018] ). The narrow exception to the preservation rule recognized in People v Lopez , 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 (1988) does not apply (seePeople v. Cruz, 192 A.D.3d 1683, 1683, 141 N.Y.S.3d 404 [4th Dept. 2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 955, 147 N.Y.S.3d 538, 170 N.E.3d 412 [2021] ).

Defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his admission is unpreserved for our review because he "did not move on that ground either to withdraw his admission to the violation of probation or to vacate the judgment revoking his sentence of probation" (People v Verin, 191 A.D.3d 1245, 1246 [4th Dept 2021]; see also People v Fox, 159 A.D.3d 1435, 1435 [4th Dept 2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 1116 [2018]). The narrow exception to the preservation rule recognized in People v Lopez (71 N.Y.2d 662, 666 [1988]) does not apply (see People v Cruz, 192 A.D.3d 1683, 1683 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 955 [2021]).