From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crossley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

July 12, 1991

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Motion to extend time to take appeal denied. Memorandum: In moving for permission to file and serve a late notice of appeal (see, CPL 460.30), defendant alleges that the failure to file the notice timely was due to improper conduct of his trial counsel, who failed to file a notice of appeal on his behalf. Defense counsel has provided us with a copy of a written form complying with 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a), which he gave to defendant immediately after sentencing, advising defendant of his right to appeal. On the copy of the form signed by defendant, defendant indicated that he did not wish to take an appeal. This documentary evidence refutes defendant's allegation of improper conduct of defense counsel.


Summaries of

People v. Crossley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Crossley

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. JAMES W. CROSSLEY, Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 678 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)