From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crossin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 11, 1997
242 A.D.2d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 11, 1997

Appeal from the County Court, Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.).


Inasmuch as defendant failed to withdraw his plea of guilty or move to vacate the judgment, he has failed to preserve for our review the validity of his plea ( see, People v. Hayes, 241 A.D.2d 627). In any event, were we to consider defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his plea of guilty, we would find it to be without merit. There is no requirement that a defendant personally recite the elements of the crime to which he or she is pleading ( see, People v. Kinch, 237 A.D.2d 830). Our review of the record reveals that defendant's affirmative response to County Court's inquiries during the plea allocution establishes that he entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea to the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree ( see, People v. Williams, 219 A.D.2d 864, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 855).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Crossin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 11, 1997
242 A.D.2d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Crossin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LUTHER CROSSIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 11, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 145

Citing Cases

People v. Santos

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree and was…

People v. Green

He asserts that County Court failed to adequately question him to ensure that his plea was knowing and…